差序式领导对员工建言行为的影响开题报告

 2022-08-09 09:04:47

1. 研究目的与意义

在管理领域,下属的工作行为在组织行为学领域一直保持着非常高的话题性。

近年来对工作行为的研究从角色内行为已经扩展到角色外行为。

从以往的研究来看,对于角色外行为的研究主要集中在两个方面,一个是组织公民行为,另一个是情景绩效,但是对于角色内的研究比较欠缺,比如员工的建言行为相关研究还缺乏相关文献的理论研究。

剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付后才能查看该篇文章全部内容!

2. 研究内容和预期目标

通过对差序式领导相关研究的总结,发现针对中国本土的研究还相对较少。

差序式领导作为一种新兴的理论但是又普遍存在领导风格的相关研究处于刚刚起步的阶段,本文将深入了解和研究差序式领导作为华人领导所普遍存在的一般现象。

本文以中国大陆本土组织情境下企业员工为例采用实证研究的方法,探讨差序式领导对于员工建言行为的影响机理,深入了解员工的工作积极程度这一调节变量在差序式领导对员工建言行为之间的作用机制,以及以学历作为虚拟变量探索其中的差异。

剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付后才能查看该篇文章全部内容!

3. 国内外研究现状

关于差序式领导的相关研究在国内的研究还比较少,也仅仅在台湾学者的研究中才能搜索到了了十几篇文章,而关于组织行为中比较重要得中介和调节变量的研究更是屈指可数,并且基于领导理论对于复杂模型的建立也是一个比较难得课题。

4. 计划与进度安排

1.被试选取:采用方便取样的方法,分别从五个城市南京、兰州、莆田、沈阳等选取不同性质企事业单位员工作为研究样本。

2.数据收集:通过网络问卷和纸质问卷等形式共发放问卷 400份,将回收的问卷剔除漏答、不认真作答的、全填写某单个选项的,筛选出有效问卷用于统计分析。

3.统计方法:主要包括描述性统计、相关分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、多元回归分析、路径分析等统计方法。

剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付后才能查看该篇文章全部内容!

5. 参考文献

[1] adams. j. c. (1963). towardan understanding of inequity. journal of abnormalandsocial psychology, 5, 422-436.[2]baron,i.l.kenny,d.(1986). themoderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.journalofpersonality and social psychology, 51: 1173#8211;1182. [3]chen, z. x. aryee, s., (2007). delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of theculturalcontextofmediatingprocessesinchina,academyofmanagement journal,vol.50(1),pp.226~238. [4]dawis,. r. v., england. g. w., lofquist, l. h., (1964). a theory of work adjustment minnesota studies vocational rehabilitation. [5]de vellisrf.(1991).scaledevelopment:theoryandapplications[j].appliedsocialresearch methods series,26. [6]edwards,j.r.,lambert,l.s.(2007).methodsforintegratingmoderationandmediation:a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.psychological methods, 12(1), 1. [7]erezm.earleyp.c.(1993).culture,self#8211;identityandwork,newyork:oxforduniversity press. [8]farh,j.l.,cheng,b.s.(2000).aculturalanalysisofpaternalisticleadershipinchinese organizations.inj.t.li,a.s.tsui,e.weldon(eds.).managementandorganizationsinthechinese context.london : macmillan. [9]graen,g.b.,uhl-bien,m.(1995).relationship-basedapproachtodevelopmentof leader-memberexchange(lmx)theoryofleadershipover25years:applyingamulti-levelmulti-domain perspective. leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.[10]hayesaf,preacherkj.statisticalmediationanalysiswithamulticategoricalindependent variable[j]. british journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2014, 67(3): 451-470. [11]hofstade,g.(2001).culturesinorganizations.inculture#8217;sconsequences(2nded.).(pp. 373-422). thousand oaks: sage publications.[12]hofstede, g. h. (1980). culture''''s consequences: international differences in work-related values. newbury park, ca: sage. [13]hoppock r.(1935). job satisfaction. new york: harper brothers publishers. [14]hu, h. h., hsu, w. l., cheng, b. s.(2004).the reward allocation decision of the chinese manager:influencesofemployeecategorizationandallocationsituation.asianjournalofsocial psychology, 7(2), 221-232. [15]lockee.a.(1976).thenatureandcausesofjobsatisfaction.inm.d.dunnette(ed.),the handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. chicago, il: rand mc nally, 1297-1349. [16]masterson, s. s., stamper, c. l. (2003). perceived organizational membership: an aggregate framework representing the employee#8211;organization relationship. journal of organizational behavior, 24(5), 473-490. [17]newman,k.l.,nollen,s.d.(1996).cultureandcongruence:thefitbetweenmanagement practices and national culture. journal of international business studies, 24, 753#8211;79. [18]pellegrini,e. k.,scandura,t.a.(2006).leader-memberexchange(lmx),paternalismand delegationintheturkishbusinessculture:anempiricalinvestigation.journalofinternationalbusinessstudies, 37(2), 264-279.[19]pellegrini,e.k.,scandura,t.a.,jayaraman,v.(2010).cross-culturalgeneralizabilityofpaternalistic leadership: an expansion of leader-member exchange theory (lmx). group and organizationmanagement, 35(4), 391-420. [20]podsakoff,p.m.,mac kenzie,s.b.,lee,j.y.,podsakoff,n.p.(2003).commonmethod biasesinbehavioralresearch:acriticalreviewoftheliteratureandrecommendedremedies.journalof applied psychology, 88(5), 879. [21]preacherkj,hayesaf.asymptoticandresamplingstrategiesforassessingandcomparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[j]. behavior research methods, 2008, 40(3): 879-891. [22]preacher j. k., rucker d. d., hayes a. f.(2007). addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185#8211;227. [23]preacher k j. advances in mediation analysis: a survey and synthesis of new developments[j]. annual review of psychology, 2015, 66: 825-852. [24]redding, s. g. (1990). the spirit of chinese capitalism.new york: walter de gruyter. rousseau, d. m.(1989). psychological and implied contracts in organizations. [25]robbinss.p.coulterm.(2004).management(7thedition).beijing:tsinghuauniversity press,. [26]robbins, s.p. (ed). (2003). organizational behavior. new jersey: prentice-hall.[27]robert, c., probst, t. m., martocchio, j. j., drasgow, f., lawler, j. j. (2000). empowerment and continuous improvement in the united states, mexico, poland, and india: predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. journal of applied psychology, 85,643#8211;658.[28]shin,s.j.,zhou,j.(2003).transformationalleadership,conservation,andcreativity: evidence from korea. academy of management journal, 46, 703#8211;14.[29]silin,r.h.(1976).leadershipandvalue:theorganizationoflarge-scaletaiwan enterprises.cambridge, ma: harvard university. [30]sobel,m.e.(1982).asymptoticconfidenceintervalsforindirecteffectsinstructuralequation models. sociological methodology, 13(1982), 290-312. [31]stampercl,mastersonss.(2002).insideroroutsider?howemployeeperceptionsofinsider status affect their work behavior[j]. journal of organizational behavior, 23(8): 875#8722;894.[32]stamper,c.l.,masterson,s.s.(2002).insideroroutsider?howemployeeperceptionsof insider status affect their work behavior[j]. journal of organizational behavior, 23(8): 875#8722;894.[32]stamper,c.l.,masterson,s.s.(2002).insideroroutsider?howemployeeperceptionsof insider status affect their work behavior. journal of organizational behavior, 23(8), 875#8211;894. [33]triandis, h. c. (1994). culture and social behavior. new york: mc graw-hill. [34]walumbwa,f.o.,lawler,j.j.(2003).buildingeffectiveorganizations:transformational leadership,collectivistorientation,work-relatedattitudes,andwithdrawalbehaviorsinthreeemerging economies. international journal of human resource management, 14, 1083#8211;1101. [35]westwood, r. i.(1997). harmony and patriarchy: the culture basis for #8220;paternalistic leadership#8221; among the overseas chinese. organization studies, 18, 445-480. [36]yukl, g. (2002). leadership in organizations (5th ed.). upper saddle river, nj: prentice hall. [37]yukl,g.,vanfleet,d.d.(1992).theoryandresearchonleadershipinorganizations. handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 3 (2nd ed.). (pp. 147-197). palo alto, ca, us: consulting psychologists press. [38]陈介玄,高承恕.(1991).台湾企业运作的社会秩序:人情关系与法律.东海学报,32, 219-232. [39]陈星宏.(2011).家长式领导、差序式领导与部署反应:文化价值的调节效果[d].嘉义:国立中正大学心理学研究所. [40]崔益艳. (2013).领导成员交换与员工沉默行为关系研究.商业时代, (36), 68-69. [41]樊景立与郑伯埙.(2000).华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析,本土心理学研究, vol. 13: 127-180 [42]费孝通(1948)费孝通(1948)。

乡土中国与乡土重建。

上海:观察社。

剩余内容已隐藏,您需要先支付 10元 才能查看该篇文章全部内容!立即支付

课题毕业论文、开题报告、任务书、外文翻译、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。